And the memory problems are majoritarian related to larger transport systems with a high number of lines, vehicles, stops, passengers, or even the overall number of buildings directly increasing the population of the map. The game never used really more than 2 GB on my computer.
This already would be a reason to set the minimum specification to 4 GB. So the minimum spec of 3 GB is really confusing for users of low-end-machines who do not know anything about 32bit or 64bit. However, the problem with low-memory (low-end) machines is mainly limited to the user space of 32 bit systems with only 2 GB which is not meeting the minimum specifications. Which I can partly follow - of course you want to keep the memory usage as low as possible. P.S.: I too like the new buildings and are working on my map as often as I can find time for it.Įdit: removed the "offending part" and rephrased for better delivering my messageįirst of all, I am not annoyed in any way.Īt least this is no technical limitation but a decision of you guys. The main problem with memory-related crashes is based on 32bit systems with less than the minimum amount of memory available for the game, and with huge maps (many passengers, lines, etc.) I testet it myself, even with all buildings on one map the memory usage is not increased above the minimum requirement. However, compared to the whole game the additional hardware requirement for a few buildings is marginal. *maybe the minimum specifications would have been increased a little bit.
Just tell us the truth - that (for any reason) you don't want to combine the sets.Īlthough there would have been many possibilities to solve it in an other (even better) way, it is perfectly okay to keep the two sets separated from my point of view. Even as "modder" it is possible to combine the two sets. Only the decision of not using more buildings in one map. Click to expand.How I see it, there are no technical limitations*.
0 kommentar(er)
